{"id":86,"date":"2011-05-14T02:13:07","date_gmt":"2011-05-14T02:13:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/astronomy.snjr.net\/blog\/?p=86"},"modified":"2011-05-14T02:17:18","modified_gmt":"2011-05-14T02:17:18","slug":"the-astrolabe","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/astronomy.snjr.net\/blog\/?p=86","title":{"rendered":"The Astrolabe"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>

Astrolabe<\/p><\/div>\n

My doctoral research focused on instruments derived from Ptolemaic principles. However, one of the observatories on which I based my project was also associated with an astrolabe<\/a> foundry during the first half of the 18th century. Technically, astrolabes aren’t Ptolemaic. The stereographic projection<\/a> on which the astrolabe depends was first described by Hipparchus c. 150 BCE, some 250 years before Ptolemy described it in his\u00a0Planisphaerium <\/em>(2nd c. CE). All the same, I could see needing to explain functionality of the instrument to my dissertation committee, so I started keeping track of the better resources on the instrument in my research notes.<\/p>\n

A few fragmented astrolabes exist at one of my research sites, mostly in the form of tympani missing the necessary moving parts (the rete, rule and alidade) to make them useful. Staring at the tympani didn’t do me much good and my reading made sense in theory, but lacked practical examples. I really didn’t want to find myself standing in front of my examination committee, stammering for an answer when they asked me to explain how to use an astrolabe to determine local solar time.<\/p>\n

Enter Adler Planetarium, the sole purveyor of Roderick S. Webster’s Astrolabe Kit<\/a>, the solution to my problem.* I’m a great believer in hands-on learning experiences. \u00a0If you want to know how something works, try building it for yourself. \u00a0Or try putting it back together after you’ve taken it apart. It works with construction methods used in residential design and, as it turns out, it also works with astrolabes.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Front of Astrolabe, showing tympanum, rete and rule<\/p><\/div>\n

Webster’s kit is a little pricey (around $20) but I think I’ve gotten twenty bucks worth of entertainment and education out of it. \u00a0It took me about three days to build the thing because of its complicated glue demands. Without glue, it would’ve required 30 minutes, tops, including sanding the rough edges and assembly. Learning how to use the thing is been a different matter. I’ve spent (literally) hours sitting at my desk working through the various problems it’s supposed to help me solve. Local skies have been persistently overcast, so I’ve been using Stellarium<\/a> to help me determine the altitudes of various stars (if the skies ever clear up, I’ll be able to sight them through the rule on the back of the astrolabe. IF THE SKIES EVER CLEAR UP.). I’m currently using the tympanum set up for a latitude of 42 degrees. \u00a0That gives me the skies about Barcelona (41 23 N), Marseilles (43 20 N), Rome (41 54 N), Sofia (42 40 N), and Vladivostok (43 10 N) with which to play this evening.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Back of Astrolabe, showing rule<\/p><\/div>\n

And playing is what I’ve been doing. Sidereal time, solar time, time from the sun, sunrise and sunset, the positions of the moon and planets, rising and setting of a few major stars… Some calculations are working better than others, but I’m not quite sure why. Once I’ve determined the latitude of a star and set the rete, I never move it, no matter what problem I’m trying to solve. It’s a bit of a mystery as to why one answer is immediately obvious and the next isn’t, but it’s also a bit of fun.<\/p>\n

*N.B. I spent an outrageous amount of time trying to find the kit in the newest version of Adler’s online store, yet still failed to locate it. You might have to call them if you really want one.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

My doctoral research focused on instruments derived from Ptolemaic principles. However, one of the observatories on which I based my project was also associated with an astrolabe foundry during the first half of the 18th century. Technically, astrolabes aren’t Ptolemaic. The stereographic projection on which the astrolabe depends was first described by Hipparchus c. 150 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-86","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-instruments"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/astronomy.snjr.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/86","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/astronomy.snjr.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/astronomy.snjr.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/astronomy.snjr.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/astronomy.snjr.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=86"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/astronomy.snjr.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/86\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/astronomy.snjr.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=86"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/astronomy.snjr.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=86"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/astronomy.snjr.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=86"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}